Bare Concrete Walls.
If you are tempted by the recent series "The World's Most Extraordinary Homes"; or the recent publicity following the refurbishment of the brutalist South Bank Centre in London; or my argument you should maximise thermal mass - you might deliberately have bare concrete walls.
Over the years only a couple of my clients buried their electrics in the concrete. Look carefully at these images for any sign of electrics, as well as making your mind up if you like the idea.
These first images are all of the refurbished South Bank Centre including a few ideas exhibited inside by school children.
I have deliberately tried to pick out blemishes. Concreting is hard work so imperfections are to be expected. However, bare steel reinforcement should be covered over. Here you see holes that housed the threaded bar during the pour. Some filled in, some not. Or perhaps some of the hole repairs were so poor that they came out with jet washing during the refurbishment. Note of caution: don't leave these holes in waterproof concrete walls in case some of your repairs fail to be waterproof, use my rods.
Here I think you see ends of bare steel that were inside the formwork to control the concrete width.
This is the front that faces the Thames.
This detail of the front shows walls that are actually beams up in the air. Notice how mucky the formwork must have been inside. The underneath needed patching up.
Waffles give the engineer depth to make the roof strong whilst reducing the weight in the roof.
Years ago, when I was the site engineer on a multi storey car park, we hired in plastic waffles to create the voids. But years later producing something similar in a basement ceiling over a swimming pool I bought polystyrene void formers.
Inside the Centre now.
I am attracted by the variety of finishes available with concrete. I would like this as one wall in a room with completely different finishes on other walls.
Little differences in the thickness of the boards remain in the finish.
As do bigger differences in the boards.
Lighting can be used to highlight the details.
I was struck by how similar in colour, and therefore boring, so much concrete was.
LED lighting might be used to add colour to it.
Just in case you were wondering exactly what is brutalism?
The year 5 schoolchildren came up with these ideas as well.
The series on the BBC comprised of 4 episodes and they studied about 3 homes in each. Of the 12 or so, about half had bare concrete inside.
None of them, as far as I noticed, had any of the rusty metal popular on Grand Designs in recent years.
Quite a few of the owners were architects.
One of them said 'perfect architecture becomes very boring, accept mistakes'.
I'm not sure I would accept the degree of mistakes I have seen sometimes.
By complete coincidence, a self-builder who used my rods and waterproofer a few years ago was also an architect.
He sent me a few photos showing how he got on, which was very well.
This one is the outside of his basement before he backfilled.
It now seems a very good example of what could be achieved deliberately.
Here are 30 or so images from the series and at the end a couple of photos selected from my work - that were never expected to be seen bare, but it shows you what might be normal using timber boards for shuttering.
I like the idea of bare concrete but I would want more variety, more timber grain and better workmanship so that there were fewer voids and less distinct lines where snots of concrete were bashed off.
At the very end I have added a couple of photos showing instances where the formwork wasn't quite right and no one did anything about it before the concrete was poured. My formwork method using timber makes it much easier not to make these mistakes.
At this junction of 4 panels we seem to have everything going on. Perhaps mastic was used between panels and the concrete later patched up.
This is a shot of the panel system. Note between the top horizontal panels and the vertical panels beneath the round waler plates on the threaded rod that goes through the wall.
This looks like they used timber shuttering with the boards in 2 directions.
In this photo you can see how they chose to fill in the holes where the threaded rods had gone through.
An electric light.
And a socket. I don't know why there is a different surface either side of where some panels were joined together. Perhaps the timber face was damaged along the edge and patched up before this wall was formed.
Or the panels might have bent back and they had to chisel concrete off where it was proud then made good, and this might be the repair we see.
Timber around the window. Perhaps that covers external insulation.
I think these vertical lines have to be something to do with spray foam or mastic between the formwork panels.
Just a bit of theory about the durability of concrete surfaces.
Concreting gangs on big sites realised long ago that if they stick the vibrating poker down between the steel and the formwork the surface would look better with fewer air holes. This is because the vibrator makes tiny pockets of air join up into bigger bubbles that float to the surface and escape - except that where bubbles come into contact with a solid formwork face the bubbles stick. They don't float. They don't escape.
Unfortunately, if the gang don't always keep the poker moving, they could vibrate the timber surface too much and that vibration can cause bleeding. That means that the vibrating formwork knocks the solid stones away, then the solid sand, then the solid grains of cement and the concrete surface against the formwork is very watery and won't get much strength. It would wear in places, such as around a light switch.
It was found, years ago, that a vegetable oil release agent on the shuttering created more air bubbles in the surface of the concrete than other types, presumably those that smell of diesel.
In Japan they had a building boom throughout the 90s and by the noughties they were having to fix problems.
The academic conclusion was that no-one had liked using the vibrator so compaction was poor.
The solution they proposed was that in future a self-compacting concrete (SCC) should be used.
The issues with SCC would be:
Additional cost and complexity.
Grout loss through any voids in the formwork - which could prevent waterproof concrete being waterproof, as well as compromise strength if grout loss was severe.
Self-compacting concrete, to be successful, needs
A concrete producer whose staff at the batching plant understand what they are doing and using. They need specific training and supervision.
A supervisor on site ensuring voids in formwork are minimal and very thin indeed.
A supervisor on site to ensure that the concrete is pumped properly. Self-compacting concrete is not self-levelling. A supervisor is needed to make sure the workforce don't just let the concrete flow around the walls on its own, because the grout will have flowed and the large stones will have stayed put.
A supervisor is needed to make sure that the concrete is delivered to the bottom of the wall properly. Segregated self-compacting concrete is still segregated.
A supervisor is needed to make sure that there is still some vibrating to help all the air escape without causing segregation or bleeding.
In my opinion, timber boards instead of panels are far less industrial looking and the grain far more interesting.
Deliberate use of boards of slightly different thickness.
You can get variety as well from using a mix of planed and sawn timber.
They didn't fill the gaps between the boards behind the sink with mastic or foam, neither did they knock all the snots off, creating variety with the large wall.
This ear stuck on a door made me realise they missed a trick.
Any timber board in the formwork could have anything carved into it. Where this wooden chopping board is carved out, the concrete would be proud. Names, pictures, puzzles, games ..... ears.
So many things would be possible.
Is the wall at the back concrete or timber? It could be concrete.
Timber and concrete side by side.
Another way of dealing with the holes left by steel threaded bars.
Looks like the vibrator did not compact the concrete in the corner. Interesting they did not bag it up, which means filling it in by rubbing in with a semi dry cement and silver sand mix.
Timber around the window opening again.
This blemish is where they emptied one lorry load of concrete and compacted the concrete. But the last of that load remains in the concrete pump tubes until a new load arrives, is discharged and pushes that older concrete out.
In this case, the next load was delayed so the concrete in the pipe began to set. When it came out it wouldn't compact properly.
The gang should have expected this and after the new concrete was coming through they should have come back with the pump, put some runny concrete on top of the old and worked it thoroughly with the poker to mix the two together and avoid this voiding.
Sometimes the voiding is a cone shape. That's when the pump pipe was above the concrete already in and dribbling slowly while waiting for the next load. That dribbling wasn't compacted.
They avoided continuous vertical joints in this wall.
April 2018. Examples of concrete are popping up everywhere. This next photo is a link to a page with many more photos of this very thin concrete house overlooking the Pacific Ocean.
The following are my photos.
These boards were scaffold board timber without steel ends. A variety of snots, good grain and knots.
Notice the fibreglass threaded rods that I cast in to avoid leaving holes in otherwise waterproof concrete. Near top left you can see one rod has been cut off flush and you can see the thin nut that kept the forms apart.
These walls were formed with regularised timber which was all saved to use inside the new house being built. You can see where the line of fibreglass rods was cut off. Regularised timber has rounded edges, so the wall has proud lines of concrete too substantial to knock off.
Here you see the thin nuts doing their job.
This timber is regularised and treated 6x2. Regularised timber is often the cheapest, but the rounded edges leave a proud line of concrete.
If you use planed timber it costs a lot more money and if you are fussy about the finish you might not want to use planed timber twice.
18mm plywood bends between the 4x2s backing it up and where the ply is nailed to the 4x2s you will see the nail heads in the concrete.
The cheapest planed timber might be floor boards. But floor boards need to be supported underneath every 400mm. If you have 4x2s vertically behind floor boards then you need rods every 400mm as well.
If it were for me, I think I would use scaffold board timber. 38mm thick only needs the rods and strongback timbers every metre.
You could buy scaffold boards then get them planed through a thicknesser.
Another advantage of a thicker board, compared to 18mm ply, is that you can fix through the brace into the board from the back. This makes striking the formwork much easier. It also means no marks in the concrete from screw heads.
Very few signs of electrics in all these bare concrete walls. I have another page about electrics.
I always use Turbo Coach Screws from Screwfix. M6 dia. 8mm hex head. They drive in and out easily with the right cordless tools and with a 70mm long screw it goes through the 47mm upright and 23mm into the 38mm thick scaffold board without leaving a mark the other side.
The joint between the scaffold board needs to be patched over with plywood.
But if all your joints were haphazard then the board above and below a joint would be strong enough to stop the wall length spreading without a patch. But the board ends might bend in under the weight of concrete. That might be a reason for using 6x2s instead.
You should experiment with a sample wall of sufficient height to have the same concrete pressure your actual walls will endure.
I took this photo years ago. The carpenters that formed this wall with plywood did not clean the bottom first so water leaked through sand under the concrete and the rebates were supposed to line up and be continuous, but they aren't continuous and one section of wall is stepped back from the other.
This is a pub beside the Thames in Fulham. I doubt it was originally intended that this soffit would be on view. The carpenters would have noticed one sheet of ply caught on another, but they couldn't be bothered to put it right.
This slightly odd ceiling effect was because they used polythene sheet over laid-flat scaffold boards instead of oiling the timber. It was an experiment where the concrete would be covered over. Are the creases in the polythene a problem or decorative? They told me the polythene got trapped along some edges and needed cutting off leaving a thin, black line in corners.
If the formwork was covered in overlapping but smaller pieces of polythene, maybe the creases would be prevented and maybe the feint outline of the overlapping shapes would add intrigue?
This next peculiar finish was the inside of a garage, so the concrete will remain visible.
The client chose to line the inside of his wall formwork with hardboard to create a very smooth finish.
Perhaps the white material is his release oil and it will clean off. Some of the hardboard got loose when the concrete went in and ended up buried in the wall concrete.
It seems to me a very difficult way to make walls different - but hardboard could work very well on a ceiling instead of polythene. You might get an almost reflective surface.
At the foot of every page you will find this image. Click it to go to our menu page where every page is listed.
Clicking the banner at the top will return you to the home page.
The Page After That